What happened
This market resolved NO on June 1, 2026. The market's pricing turned out to be more accurate than PRISM's assessment.
Forecast Tape
10 events- May 10, 8:05 AMPUBLISHED
Prism 23% vs market 28% — NONE FAIR
- May 10, 10:05 PMMARKET MOVED
Market 28% → 20% (-8pp)
- May 18, 12:05 PMMARKET MOVED
Market 20% → 32% (+12pp)
- May 19, 2:08 AMMARKET MOVED
Market 32% → 17% (-15pp)
- May 21, 4:05 AMMARKET MOVED
Market 17% → 23% (+6pp)
- May 21, 6:09 PMRE-ANALYZED
Forecast NONE → MODERATE at Prism 27%
- May 21, 6:09 PMMARKET MOVED
Market 23% → 34% (+11pp)
- May 22, 2:07 AMRE-ANALYZED
Forecast MODERATE → NONE at Prism 23%
- May 22, 2:07 AMMARKET MOVED
Market 34% → 26% (-8pp)
- Jun 1, 1:57 PMRESOLVED NO
Resolved NO. Market was closer than Prism on this call.
What the market believed
The market was pricing this event at 33.5% probability when PRISM generated its forecast. PRISM assessed this was too high — the market was overconfident.
What PRISM believed
- ▸Fundamental analysis indicates a low probability of a definitive agreement given the White House's public stance linking sanctions relief to Iran's nuclear concessions
- ▸The market appears to be overestimating the likelihood of a breakthrough before the deadline
- +Ongoing negotiations between U.S. and Iran
- +Market pricing reflects some probability of a last-minute deal
- −White House publicly states 'no sanctions relief' without Iran giving up enriched uranium
- −No official announcement of agreement as of May 26
- −Short timeframe remaining until May 31 deadline
Why the gap existed
Prism correctly identified 6.5% mispricing
How this forecast played out
Get live PRISM forecasts for Kalshi + Polymarket.
Edge scores, Kelly references, confidence levels, and resolution paths — updated every 2 hours, before the market corrects.
VIEW LIVE FORECASTS